Monday, December 21, 2009, 5:53PM ET - U.S. Markets Closed.

Roubini: Fully Nationalizing Citi and Bank of America Would Be Better

Posted Feb 27, 2009 06:15pm EST by Aaron Task in Newsmakers, Recession, Banking
Friday's announcement the government will convert up to $25 billion of its Citigroup preferred stock into common equity represents Uncle Sam's third direct attempt to rescue the floundering bank.

The conversion would give the government up to 36% control of Citigroup stock and leave existing common shareholders with as little as 26% of the company's common stock. That explains why the stock tumbled 39% to $1.50 Friday despite CEO Vikram Pandit's strange declaration: "In many ways for those people who have a concern about nationalization, this announcement should put those concerns to rest."

Pandit's claim is "like saying you're half-pregnant," says Nouriel Roubini and economics professor at NYU's Stern School and chairman of RGE Monitor.

"The government has already taken over the financial system," Roubini says, noting U.S. policymakers have committed $9 trillion to rescue the financial system and already spent $2 trillion. "So let's stop the delusion about 'no nationalization.'"

Roubini, who has publicly advocated for temporary nationalization of insolvent banks, says fully nationalizing Citigroup and/or Bank of America would have a minimal effect on the Dow, which is a price-weighted average. More importantly, he believes full nationalizations (vs. the current partial, piecemeal effort) would be better for the market and the economy because it's the first step in the process of cleaning up "bad" banks so they can later be sold back to private investors, i.e. "re-privatized", as was the case last year with IndyMac.

Tune in Monday as we'll have more from Roubini on:

  • Why nationalization is the right course and Bill Gross is wrong.
  • Why Ben Bernanke's "reasonable prospect" for a recovery in 2010 is unreasonable.
  • What the Tresaury's ongoing "stress tests" of big banks means, and doesn't mean.
Go to Tech Ticker
177 votes|Recommend this

364 Comments

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Friday February 27, 2009 06:27PM EST

The sooner they nationalize them the better! Taxpayers have already wasted a trillion dollars on this failed plan. How much more are we going to take. Call or write your congressman and tell them enough is enough. Nationaliziing will protect the taxpayers and unfreeze the credit markets. Roubini for Treasury Secretary.

- Friday February 27, 2009 06:29PM EST

Roubini is an idiot who thinks he's a genius....

- Friday February 27, 2009 06:35PM EST

I think Roubini has a large investment AGAINST BAC and C surviving. I can't believe how often I see him on different TV channnels promoting nationalization. I wish someone would ask him of any personal gain regarding these matters, it seems he's way too active in his campaign against the banks....I suppose there's no way to verify his position even if he gave it to us.

- Friday February 27, 2009 06:44PM EST

roubini is right, nationalize citi and bofa, get the bad assets off their books and then sell it back to the private sector.

- Friday February 27, 2009 06:51PM EST

In S&L crisis, Selling continental bank's assets took about 7 years after nationalization. Anyone who thinks bank like Citi can be nationalized and sold off in less than a year is delusional. This usually happens if you have no real experience but idealistic thoughts which professors of doom and gloom can. Government has nationalized fannie, AIG etc. Let them turn a profit from them first and then we will see. Talk is cheap.. These congressmen can not even pass a budget and then pass budgets with huge deficits and I doubt if they can be trusted more than managements of these banks. Also, old management which made these risks is gone and hopefully, new managements will be able to turn BOA, Citi around. It will take a while and so patience is highly recommended.. Meanwhile, there should be some action put in place to claw back the huge bonuses older managements got for placing risky bets.

- Friday February 27, 2009 06:52PM EST

Roubini has close relationship with those hedge funds who are shorting Bank of America stock. So don't listen to him. Bank of America is a very strong and profitable company. The company has clearly told public that they do not need anymore money from the government. Also, as far as I know, many important people has suggested OBAMA and SEC to ban/stop short banks' stock and I believe SEC will ban all short stock activities until the economy become better. So you will see either Roubini and the hedge funds shorting bank of American stock will become bankarupt or they will be sued in the court!!!

- Friday February 27, 2009 06:53PM EST

In S&L crisis, Selling continental bank's assets took about 7 years after nationalization. Anyone who thinks bank like Citi can be nationalized and sold off in less than a year is delusional. This usually happens if you have no real experience but idealistic thoughts which professors of doom and gloom can. Government has nationalized fannie, AIG etc. Let them turn a profit from them first and then we will see. Talk is cheap.. These congressmen can not even pass a budget and then pass budgets with huge deficits and I doubt if they can be trusted more than managements of these banks. Also, old management which made these risks is gone and hopefully, new managements will be able to turn BOA, Citi around. It will take a while and so patience is highly recommended.. Meanwhile, there should be some action put in place to claw back the huge bonuses older managements got for placing risky bets.

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Friday February 27, 2009 06:57PM EST

No effect on dow? You must be kidding... This will destroy every bank stock as people will be terrified to invest in banking. Another joke is about private investor. Do you really think any private investor with any experience has appetite to take on anything as big as Citi or BOA? Maybe JP Morgan but then do you really want to create one extremely big to fail entity?

- Friday February 27, 2009 06:58PM EST

Our financial system is broken. To fix it we need to flush out the corrupt and incompetent. Nationalization protects tax payers and will allow America the time to change the rules and flush out the ones that caused this mess so that it doesn't happen again. Nationalization should not be used to maintain the status quo. And should only be used temporarily until we fix the system. There are those who want the current system with the same rules to survive because it's a vestige of their influence and power in the financial system. To change it would mean to loose control and money. I say let the corrupt and incompetent live by their decisions. The time has come to change who is in charge. In our system only the strong and ethical should survive. If we don't like nationalization then we should let the banks die by the sword they once wielded.

- Friday February 27, 2009 07:04PM EST

just glad I don't have any citi stock--My ass can't take much more of this!!

- Friday February 27, 2009 07:04PM EST

Everyone on this program seems to worried about how we get the banks back into a strong position without much concern for those holding stock now. If nationalization can bring the banks back then non-nationalization taking the same steps should be able to do it also. This would protect the equity of those invested.

- Friday February 27, 2009 07:08PM EST

There is a thin line between idiot and genious...Roubini has crossed the line!

- Friday February 27, 2009 07:10PM EST

Roubini is popular because he has been right on the economy and the banks and the stock market. He has been telling everyone for 2 years now. But still I am very concerned about his call for nationalization, as that would trigger derivative settlement, which would ruin everything and everybody. No business, no job, for all. No credit, nothing. Massive huge depression for many years. And there is no way our "beginner" president or Congress could or would fix anything properly. The derivative problem and its aftermath is too huge for nationalization of any important company (GM, AIG, BofA, etc). Note the devistating affect of letting Lehman go under, and what that did to the world due to the derivatives - and still all the affect is not over yet. But give Roubini his due, he has been right, and is one of the few that should be listened to. All the others (nearly) are fools and have been dead wrong. Treasury Dept head would be a good job for him.

- Friday February 27, 2009 07:10PM EST

jeff808066, Are you serious? When the SEC stopped the short selling of stocks last year, that was the slap in the face of people who correctly predicted the fall of these banks. Why should the "smart" people get punished for the dumb ones (banks) mistakes. Next if BAC is turning profits, why do they have their hands out for bailout money? Finally stopping the shorting of bank stocks won't hide the toxic garbage on their balance sheets. The banks are insolvent. Their stock value deserves to plummet.

- Friday February 27, 2009 07:11PM EST

jeff808066, Are you serious? When the SEC stopped the short selling of stocks last year, that was the slap in the face of people who correctly predicted the fall of these banks. Why should the "smart" people get punished for the dumb ones (banks) mistakes. Next if BAC is turning profits, why do they have their hands out for bailout money? Finally stopping the shorting of bank stocks won't hide the toxic garbage on their balance sheets. The banks are insolvent. Their stock value deserves to plummet.

- Friday February 27, 2009 07:15PM EST

When You paid the tax soon It is not your money. Waste or not does not matter. Nationalization will white out some body money.

Yahoo! Finance User
Yahoo! Finance User - Friday February 27, 2009 07:17PM EST

All the bashers of this article are probably C and BAC shareholders. You should look things from a common taxpayer point of view. I agree with Roubini, there is no point of throwing more money without concrete results.

- Friday February 27, 2009 07:17PM EST

he has no idea about what he is talking about. he talked like gov can take over c and bac, clean them up in a short period of it... he is simply clueless about implementation details.. not practical at all. i think this guy is harming the market...

- Friday February 27, 2009 07:17PM EST

roubini is right. ask sweden and every country who's had a financial collapse of their banks. right now, we're giving trillions away to the cronies for free. why? to protect the bankers(cronies). the ignorance of some americans is appalling. not to mention, the collapse of american banks not only mean problems for the u.s. but for europe, japan, and pretty much aligned with the west. unless you want total devastation for the entire western civilization, don't nationalize and continue to give the elite fraternities and their cronies trillions more. seriously, americans have the be the dumbest, more narrow minded people in the industrialized world. i get sick just listening to some of you morons!

- Friday February 27, 2009 07:18PM EST

roubini is right. ask sweden and every country who's had a financial collapse of their banks. right now, we're giving trillions away to the cronies for free. why? to protect the bankers(cronies). the ignorance of some americans is appalling. not to mention, the collapse of american banks not only mean problems for the u.s. but for europe, japan, and pretty much aligned with the west. unless you want total devastation for the entire western civilization, don't nationalize and continue to give the elite fraternities and their cronies trillions more. seriously, americans have the be the dumbest, more narrow minded people in the industrialized world. i get sick just listening to some of you morons!

Yahoo! reserves the right to refuse, or remove any comment that does not comply with the Yahoo! Terms of Service. The submission of spam, hateful, or obscene messages may result in the termination of your Yahoo! ID.
About Tech Ticker - Send FeedbackDisclaimer. Copyright © 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright/IP Policy - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Help
Quotes delayed, except where indicated otherwise. Delay times are 15 mins for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges.

Quotes and other information supplied by independent providers identified on the Yahoo! Finance partner page. Quotes are updated automatically, but will be turned off after 25 minutes of inactivity. Quotes are delayed at least 15 minutes for NASDAQ, NYSE and Amex. See also delay times for other exchanges. Real-Time continuous streaming quotes are available through our premium service. You may turn streaming quotes on or off. Fundamental company data provided by Capital IQ. Financials data provided by Edgar Online. Historical chart data and daily updates provided by Commodity Systems, Inc. (CSI). International historical chart data, daily updates, fund summary, fund performance, dividend data and Morningstar Index data provided by Morningstar, Inc. Analyst estimates data provided by Thomson Financial Network. All data provided by Thomson Financial Network is based solely upon research information provided by third party analysts. Yahoo! has not reviewed, and in no way endorses the validity of such data. Yahoo! and ThomsonFN shall not be liable for any actions taken in reliance thereon. All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.